The “we’ve GOT to be sillier!” July 15-16 2025 e-forum began with participants introducing themselves and sharing why they were drawn to this topic. Librarians and library workers from a variety of backgrounds were interested in building relationships across campus and learning how other library workers incorporated silliness into their practice.
Then, we added some context to the conversation by discussing our roles at our libraries, how we foster approachability in our work, and some of the limitations around silliness at our institutions. Participants put forward several ideas, including making noise when approaching patrons so they don’t get startled, dressing in an approachable manner, and making trustworthy campus connections to continue a “culture of yes,” even if that patron’s needs are not met at the library.
In the afternoon, we moved on from context to discussing the work of approachability and silliness. Participants discussed ways they made their libraries more welcoming. Some of these ideas included:
- Personalizing interactions with students
- Being attentive to students’ body language without overly monitoring them
- Showing up to campus events outside of the library
We also examined low-input program ideas that libraries could implement. Participants shared ideas like a pet of the month competition to highlight staff pets, an “ask me anything” booth, social media posts that highlighted staff interests, and a “stump the librarian” event where students ask librarians tough research questions, and librarians have to try to answer them. Some participants expressed that they were sometimes asked to serve as a Gen Z translator.
On the second day of the e-forum, our discussion centered around themes of communication, advocacy, and assessment. Participants noted that conversations with their student workers helped them stay up to date on trends and student interests. We also addressed how to advocate for “silly” programs that others may not see as important. One participant pointed out that they had success backing up their silly programs with research on student success, which highlights the importance of balancing serious study with levity.
Our discussion on assessment focused on measuring difficult-to-assess areas and sharing assessment resources. Participants noted that it was difficult to find time for assessment because they felt that assessing approachability was a long-term project.
Want to keep the conversation going? Join us over at our Discord Silly Librarians Coalition! Please contact one of the moderators if you are wanting to join.
Moderators
Mary Elizabeth Schiavone (schiavonem@beloit.edu)
Tristan M.K. Draper (drapert@beloit.edu)
Easton Brundage (ebrundage@luc.edu)
